Permanent Shelter: Introduction

This is the first in a series on permanent shelter that we’ll be publishing here at Plan | Prepare.  The purpose of this series of articles is to discuss permanent shelters.  Most of us already have a permanent shelter.  However, that shelter may or may not be a viable location for long-term survival.  Numerous first-hand accounts from disaster survivors around the world all have a similar theme: There is no one-size-fits-all shelter solution for every potential disaster.  In some cases, bugging in at your urban or sub-urban location may be the best.  In other cases, bugging-out to a rural location may work better.  Each option has its plusses and minuses.

Before we get too far into this discussion, let’s define “permanent shelter”.

Webster’s Free Online Dictionary defines “permanent” as: continuing or enduring without fundamental or marked change and “shelter” as: something that covers or affords protection

So, a permanent shelter is something durable (enduring) that provides cover or protection.  Simple enough, right?  Maybe.

Many people will disagree on the definition of durable, enduring or continuing.  The Bedouins, for instance, have lived in tents for centuries.  Here in the United States, we might not consider a tent a permanent shelter.

We’re starting to spiral here.  Let’s simplify and see if we can all agree.

For the sake of these articles, let’s say that a permanent shelter is synonymous with a house.  It might be large or small.  It might have a wood, stucco or brick exterior.  It might be wood-frame or poured concrete.  There are thousands of variables, but pretty much everyone has a solid mental picture of a house.  In case you’re a Bedouin, I’ve included a picture of a house below.

House or Permanent Shelter

Now that we have that settled, let’s discuss the purpose of a permanent shelter as it relates to survival and disaster preparedness.

A permanent shelter should:

  • Provide protection from the elements
  • Provide protection from people or other predators
  • Provide adequate space to accommodate those living within its confines
  • Provide a sense of security
  • Provide a sense of privacy
  • Provide a sense of civility (a representation of a civilized world)
  • Provide a hub or touchstone for a household or family

Obviously, protection from the elements is key to survival – particularly in harsh climates.  A permanent shelter’s ability to protect its inhabitants from rain, snow, cold and even heat is critical to survival. 

Most permanent shelters are designed with some capability to protect their inhabitants from both two-legged and four-legged predators.  The average permanent shelter, however, is relatively vulnerable to determined two-legged predators.  Glass windows can be smashed.  Doors can be pried open.  Let’s face it, the average “home” poses only a small deterrent to a motivated attacker or looter.  If we spend too much time thinking about this, the sense of security provided by the permanent shelter begins to erode.

The concept of adequate space varies widely as you travel from region to region.  It’s not uncommon for entire families in Third World countries to live in houses the size of a closet in a suburban home in the United States.  Here in the U.S., it’s not all that uncommon for entire rooms of larger houses to go unused for weeks or months.  However, feeling that we have adequate space plays into our mental and emotional state of being.  The Rule of Threes suggests that we can live for three months without hope.  Living in a permanent shelter far smaller than one is used to living in can have an impact on one’s ability to keep hope alive.

Generally, our sense or privacy is maintained by shutting out the world outside.  We draw the curtains, close the door and cloister ourselves away to keep prying eyes out of our business.  Privacy helps breed a sense of well-being.  Imagine having to bathe or change clothes in public and you’ll begin to understand why privacy is important to morale.

For many modernized societies, the permanent shelter has become an icon of civilization.  Perhaps you have traveled to a country where many of the citizens live in huts.  Prejudice aside, Americans, Western Europeans and others look at those huts and see temporary shelters.  As a result, we make assumptions that the inhabitants of those huts are less civilized than we are.  We have become accustomed to houses … permanent shelters that have a certain look about them, a certain … permanency in their construction.  Lacking that look and feel of permanency, we perceive a lack of civilization as well.

Finally, the home or permanent shelter provides a hub … a touchstone for the individuals who live there.  Whether it be a traditional family or any other type of household, home is where the heart is.  Ask yourself, why are so many adult children moving back in with their parents these days?  Why don’t they simply join communes or share space with other young adults?  Almost without exception, the home of their youth represents security at a time in their life when many feel insecure.  Is it the structure that gives them that sense of security?  Only in part.  It is the structure, combined with its inhabitants – their parents and, possibly, siblings – that gives them a much-needed sense of well-being.

So, as we look at the role of the permanent structure in survival, we see that only a fraction of its value is physical in nature.  Certainly, human beings need protection from the elements and from those who would do them harm.  What humans also need is hope.  Hope and emotional well-being are the things that make the permanent structure – and its inhabitants – so critical to long-term survival.

Food for thought as you consider your preparations:  Is your primary home adequately equipped for survival?  Do you need to establish alternative structures in different locations?  Are your permanent shelters truly secure?  If not, how can you make them more secure?  And, perhaps most importantly of all, will the members of your household be with you when you face disasters and uncertain circumstances?  Will you have the touchstone of hope to help you maintain your survival mindset?

Plan | Prepare


Planning Basics

You’ll notice that the word “plan” comes first in our name.  Here at Plan | Prepare, we are of the firm belief that you must plan before you prepare.  Preparation without planning, while not entirely useless, is considerably less efficient and effective.  If you prepare without a plan, how do you know what you’re preparing for?

We discussed The Rule of Threes in one of our first Basics articles.  Here we will discuss another Rule of Threes.  This Rule of Threes is specific to planning.

The Planning Rule of Threes: Have a plan.  Have a back-up plan.  Have a “hell-in-a-hand basket” plan.

This multi-tiered approach is common across a number of industries and disciplines.  The military, as you might expect, has their own version of this with all the requisite acronyms.  Good project managers – in all walks of life – follow a similar discipline.  What we’re discussing here is not something new.  It’s tried and true and highly recommended.

Now, let’s discuss three principles of planning.

The First Principle of Planning: There are two types of plans; those that may fail and those that have failed.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that plans are made with incomplete knowledge.  No matter how good your intel, no matter how much of a subject matter expert you are, no matter how good you are at looking into the future and seeing potential pitfalls … something – maybe several things – is going to happen that your plan simply did not, could not address.  That’s life in the real world.

The Second Principle of Planning: Plans must be flexible.

Plans that work in the real world must be flexible.  There is nothing static about the real world.  Things are constantly changing.  It’s impossible to anticipate everything that will change, when it will change and how it will change.  A rigid plan is destined to failure.  The first change may not run the rigid plan off the tracks, but one of the wheels on the locomotive may begin to wobble.  As more changes take place, the trains becomes less and less stable.  Pretty soon you have a derailment.  Putting derailed trains back on the tracks is very difficult and dangerous work.

The Third Principle of Planning: Two heads are better than one.

If you’re making a plan that involves a dozen people and you don’t discuss the plan with any of those people … how long do you think it will be before that plan becomes a failure?  If you’re relying on someone to help you execute your plan, involve them in the development of your plan.  This principle does have a law of diminishing returns, however.  If your plan relies on dozens, hundreds or thousands of people, involving them all in the development phase will not be efficient.  Try to divide your involved parties into groups and ensure that you have representation from each group.  Make sure that group representatives go back to their groups and get their feedback, funneling it back into the overall plan.

So, how do you plan for a disaster or an emergency?

Excellent question.  There are a number of ways to get started.

First, you should take a good hard look at the realities of your life.  Do you live in Tornado Alley?  Is your home built directly on top of the San Adreas Fault?  Are you on the bank of a river that floods nearly every spring?  What disasters are most likely to occur in your area?

Second, there are some disasters that are geography-independent, i.e. it doesn’t matter where you live, you’re as likely to experience this type of disaster as someone in another state, another country or on another continent.  Home fires are a good example.  Home fires, unless you live in an area regularly ravaged by fires, are not particularly specific to your location.  A home fire is more likely to be caused by careless activities or poor construction than it is because you live in Oregon or Zimbabwe – unless, of course, you’ve chosen to live in areas that are particularly dry and prone to wildfires or forest fires.

Third, some disasters have nothing to do with location or any other element within your control.  For instance, you do not have direct control over your country’s nuclear warfare policy.  Sure, you can participate in the process of electing your leaders (assuming you have that option) but the policy is not within your direct control.  Economic disasters are similar.  There is very little that you can do, personally, to prevent a country-wide economic disaster.

As you plan you must consider all types of disasters.  Then, you must prioritize.  What type of disasters are you most likely to experience?  Planning to survive these types of disasters should be your priority.  Are there common elements of planning and preparation amongst disasters regardless of how likely you are to experience them?  If so, by all means include the common elements of planning and preparation.

Overwhelming?  Perhaps.  Fortunately, there are a number of helpful resources available to those who are new to planning and preparing for disasters.  None of these resources are perfect.  Remember the First Principle?  None of these resources will be specific to your situation.  You will have to make your own assessments of these resources’ viability and make changes as necessary.  No one else can do this for you.  It’s called self-reliance and it’s one of the main keys to survival.

Here are a few links to helpful resources:

Educate Yourself a brochure (Keep reading here and at the other sites listed in our Blogroll to educate yourself further)

Family Emergency Plan from

Recommended Supplies List from

Coping with Sheltering in Place from The Red Cross

Stay tuned for more information on planning.

Plan | Prepare

The Bug-out Bag, Foundation of Preparedness?

If you found yourself here on Plan | Prepare, you’re probably familiar with the venerable bug-out bag (BOB).  You may call it a Get Out of Dodge (GOOD) bag or a 72 Hour bag or some other moniker, but a rose by any other name smells … like stale food and mothballs.

The BOB, Foundation of Preparedness

If you’re not familiar with the BOB, it’s a bag, often a backpack, filled with supplies intended to assist its carrier in his or her attempt to survive for a period of approximately 72 hours.  The bug-out and get out of Dodge names come from the intent that the bag support an individual who must leave his or her residence and rely on the bag’s contents until they reach a safe location.  To bug-out is to leave quickly … or get the [bleep] out of Dodge.

Now that you know, for sure, what a BOB is, I want to discuss whether or not the BOB is truly the foundation of preparedness.  In other words, should you put together a BOB before you make any other preparations for emergencies or disasters?

To help answer that question, let’s go back to The Rule of Threes.  What does the Rule of Threes teach us?  It gives us a basis for planning and preparation.  It gives us an order for preparation.  It helps us establish priorities.

If, then, our priorities for preparation are air, shelter, water, food and hope (in that order) and we agree that medical care over-arches all of those priorities, then why not assemble our preparations in an easy-to-carry “container” like a backpack or messenger bag?  Personally, I can’t think of a reason – other than expense – not to do so.

Let’s talk about expense for a moment.  I’ve seen BOB’s that probably cost $5.00 and I’ve seen BOB’s that probably cost closer to $500.00.  In my opinion, you do not need an expensive bag to have a functional bag.  In all likelihood, you could go down to your local Goodwill or Disabled Vets store and find a perfectly serviceable BOB.  Military surplus ALICE packs, like the one pictured, will work just fine and are easy on the budget.  It might not have a high-end manufacturer’s logo on it, but that label isn’t going to help you survive.  It might have a stain on it or have a few frayed edges, but that shouldn’t stop you from using it.  It must be serviceable.  It must be functional.  Ideally, it will be comfortable.  After all, you may end up carrying it quite some distance in a worst-case scenario.  Spending more money on your bag will not necessarily improve its serviceability, functionality or comfort.

Now that we’ve discussed the expense of a BOB, I want to address the BOB’s primary function and why I believe the BOB is the foundation of preparedness.

Why does one need a BOB?

“I might need to bug out,” you say, “so, I need a BOB.”

That logic is a bit circular but let’s take a look at it nonetheless.

Why might you need to bug out?

“Emergencies, disasters … zombies,” you say.

OK.  I’m not buying the zombie reason, but the other two seem plausible.

If you need to bug out, how much time will you have?

“Minutes, maybe hours,” you say.

Possibly quite right.  I agree.

What if it makes more sense to bug in?

“Bug in?” you say.

Uh huh.  What if it’s safer to stay in your home than to leave it and head out on the highway?

Got you thinking?

My point is that a BOB keeps everything in one place.  It has everything you might need to survive for 72 hours.  It’s organized.  You know where it is.  You’re not looking in the cupboards or going to the basement or rifling through stuff in the garage.  A BOB’s primary purpose is to keep everything you need in one place – preferably a place that is easily accessible regardless of the situation.  You might also consider the most likely disaster scenarios as you think about where to store your BOB.

In a disaster or emergency, the last thing you want to have to do is go hunting for your essentials.  The BOB – the Foundation of Preparedness – saves you the trouble.  Everything is assembled in one place … and easily portable, if necessary.

One last question about the Foundation of Preparedness ….  What holds up the foundation?  Footings.  What are the Footings of Preparedness?  Plans.  Without preparedness planning, the BOB is almost useless.

Plan | Prepare

The Rule of Threes

If you’re new to disaster preparedness, you may not be familiar with the Rule of Threes.  The Rule of Threes, like most rules, is a useful guideline.  It’s not intended to be an absolute.  One of the first rules of planning is to recognize that there are no absolutes.  There are two types of plans: those that have failed and those that may fail. 

Knowing that there are no absolutes and recognizing that any plan can fail, one can utilize the Rule of Threes to develop one’s plan … and one’s contingency plans.

Remember the Rule of Threes

Here are the rules:

  • You can survive for three minutes without air
  • You can survive for three hours without shelter (in a harsh environment)
  • You can survive for three days without water
  • You can survive for three weeks without food
  • You can survive for three months without hope

As an ancillary to The Rule of Threes, if you require medical treatment (either ongoing or immediate) or first aid, you may not survive long enough to find out if the other rules apply.

So, as you make your plans and preparations, keep The Rule of Threes in mind.  I’ve seen a lot of people’s Bug-out Bags (BOB’s) filled with weapons and ammo and food with little consideration given to air, shelter or water.  I won’t argue the fun in acquiring weapons and ammunition.  However, if you can’t breath clean air, weapons and ammunition are unlikely to be of much use … unless you can quickly trade them for a gas mask or dust mask.

Plan | Prepare